Charlie Kirk’s Staged Death & the Rise of the Global "Super Church"

What happens when the narrative is written before the facts are even examined? 

In the wake of Charlie Kirk’s dramatic death, mass media reports spread swiftly—yet, as with many pivotal events in history, not everyone is convinced by the official story. A growing chorus of voices has begun to question the strange details surrounding the incident, noting that key elements simply don’t seem to add up. These anomalies are now sparking suspicions that the event may have been part of a broader psychological operation, designed to shape public perception. As a result, some have finally begun pointing to long-standing ties between the Kirks, high-level government figures, and influential networks within the Vatican. This begs the question: could Charlie’s “death” be the catalyst for something far larger—and far more orchestrated—than anyone suspects?

Rather than rushing to conclusions, this article seeks to pull back the curtain on the powerful alliances that shaped Charlie and Erika Kirk’s rise to political stardom, and to explore why some believe his death may not be what it seems. Along the way, we will uncover how psychological operations work, evaluate the claims of a staged assassination, and then examine the Kirks’ deep connections to both Washington and the Vatican—connections that, to some, cast this event not merely as a tragedy, but as a strategic catalyst for a new religious order cloaked in the garb of Christian nationalism. As we proceed, our hope is that the real story may finally emerge—one that weaves together modern geopolitics, ecumenical ambitions, and Rome’s centuries-old quest for global dominance.

Disclaimer

Before delving into this sensitive subject, it’s important to acknowledge that God can sovereignly work through almost any circumstance or situation to reach those He intends to save (Phil. 1:18–20). Throughout history, individuals have been genuinely brought to repentance and faith in Christ even through the agency of false revivals, distorted gospels, and compromised religious movements. God never misses an opportunity to redeem a soul, though such conversions usually happen in spite of the surrounding environment, not because of it.

In that same spirit, I do not deny that good came from Charlie’s life and influence. I personally appreciated many of his campus debates, learned from his brilliant reasoning, and recognized his seemingly sincere desire to challenge the liberal ideological strongholds of this generation. I also readily admit that countless individuals have undoubtedly experienced genuine encounters with God—sincere repentance and even salvation—through events connected to Charlie Kirk’s movement, his memorial service, and the broader ecumenical stirrings that have followed. Like Paul, I rejoice to see Christ preached, whether in pretense or in truth (Phil. 1:18), and I believe that whatever the enemy intends for evil, God is able to redeem for good (Gen. 50:20; Rom. 8:28).

However, recognizing all of this does not absolve us of the responsibility to expose error. In light of what I have since learned, I now view Kirk’s efforts through a far more cautious and discerning lens. It is precisely because sincere Believers can be swept up in a mixture of truth and deception that we must carefully examine and warn against the false and dangerous elements at play. My goal is not to discredit the work of God in individual lives, but to shine a light on the counterfeit revival and ecumenical agenda that threatens to ensnare the undiscerning.

The Jesuit Dialectic: How Rome Manufactured the Leftist Threat to Unite the Church

For centuries, Vatican Rome has mastered the art of playing both sides of the political divide to achieve its long-term objectives. The Jesuit order, functioning as the strategic arm of Rome, has consistently advanced its agenda through incremental, calculated steps—using the classic Hegelian Dialectic of problem → reaction → solution. Rather than rushing toward open domination, Rome patiently creates or manipulates crises, steers public reaction, and then presents its desired “solution” as the inevitable remedy.

The ultimate target has always been the same: the dismantling of classic Protestantism, which historically stood as Rome’s greatest theological and political rival. Since the United States was founded with an overwhelming Protestant majority—hovering around 95% in its early history—Rome understood that it could not impose Catholic dominance overnight. Instead, it would need to reshape the cultural and political landscape gradually, using both major political parties—Republicans and Democrats—as unwitting tools over the course of decades.

Note: To learn more about the Roman Catholic Jesuit Order and their bid for world domination please click here or watch the following youtube documentaries here and here.

Liberalism as the Protestant “Boogeyman”

To divert Protestant attention away from Rome itself, the Vatican spent decades constructing a formidable, visible enemy: liberalism and the LGBTQ agenda. This ideological foe was carefully elevated in public discourse to become the singular focus of Protestant outrage. By doing so, Rome ensured that the Protestant community would fix its gaze on this “imminent threat,” never suspecting the true power working behind the scenes.

Once this manufactured enemy was firmly in place, the stage was set for the hero—the figure who would ride in to “save America” from the liberal menace. Enter Donald Trump, presented as the bold champion who would crush leftist extremism and restore Christian values. His entire political narrative was built around pointing the public’s attention toward the Left, ensuring that the Protestant world would ally itself with anyone who opposed liberalism, even if those allies were strategically aligned with Rome. This classic, covert warfare tactic is summed up in the phrase: “The enemy of my enemy is my friend.”

Many Christians, seeing Trump as a defender of faith, lowered their guard. They believed they had found a true friend of the Church—when in reality, they were being subtly steered toward a predetermined ecumenical alliance.

Note: To learn more about Trump's proven Jesuit connections click here, here, and here.

The Kirk–Vatican Nexus: Ecumenism Through Culture War

This is precisely where Charlie Kirk’s specially curated role comes into focus. Kirk’s task was not merely political activism; it was religious realignment through cultural warfare. As the head of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), he became a leading voice in rallying Protestants against liberalism, positioning himself as a youthful champion of conservative Christianity.

But there was a deeper strategy. By emphasizing ecumenical unity against a shared enemy, Kirk helped merge Protestant and Catholic energies into a single political-religious front. He openly admitted that TPUSA was deeply ecumenical (see here). And anyone familiar with history knows: the ecumenical road always leads back to Rome.

Kirk surrounded himself with prominent Catholics and often praised the Catholic Church (see bellow compiled evidence). In one telling social media post, he even expressed his hope that the new pope would lead America into a “new golden age of Christianity.” This is not an offhand remark; it reflects the underlying trajectory of his movement, as we shall soon discover.

The Attack on the Separation of Church and State

America’s founders—many of whom fled persecution in Catholic-dominated Europe—enshrined the separation of church and state within our constitution to prevent the kind of religious tyranny they had escaped. Protestantism flourished precisely because the state was prevented from enforcing ecclesiastical power.

Charlie Kirk, however, fervently opposed this principle (see here), crusading for a kind of hybrid patriotic Christianity that blends church and state into a political-theocratic vision. This model mirrors the Vatican’s structure, where the religious hierarchy and political authority are intertwined. His messaging resonated with patriotic Christians, but few recognized how closely it paralleled Rome’s historical template.

And let us not be naïve: figures like Kirk do not rise to national prominence by accident. Mainstream media and major platforms do not randomly elevate unknown activists. Such figures are positioned and promoted precisely because they serve a larger agenda.

Posobiec and Kirk: The Catholic Symbols Speak Loudly

Perhaps the most revealing evidence of this agenda is the close partnership between staunch Catholic activist Jack Posobiec and Charlie Kirk. These two worked relentlessly to shape the narrative of the conservative movement.

On February 21, 2024, at CPAC, Posobiec declared from the stage:

“Welcome to the end of democracy. We are here to overthrow it completely. We didn’t get all the way there on January 6, but we will endeavor to get rid of it and replace it with this right here.”

He said this while holding up a Roman Catholic cross—a symbolic gesture if there ever was one.

Later, at Charlie Kirk’s memorial, Posobiec held up Catholic rosary beads and proclaimed that Kirk had “saved Western Civilization by returning a people to a mighty God.” He then went even further, uttering a blasphemous statement: “Charlie Kirk died for all of you.” Such words dangerously echo the language reserved for Christ’s atoning sacrifice, as though Jesus’s death were not already sufficient (see video below).

From TPUSA’s founding at a Benedictine Catholic university to this openly Catholic symbolism at its leader’s memorial, the ecumenical direction of the movement is unmistakable.

Erika Kirk: The Jesuit-Educated Bridge

No less important is Erika Kirk, Charlie’s "widow". A cradle Catholic educated at Jesuit-run Regis University, Erika has been positioned as the spiritual bridge between Catholicism and the broader Christian world. Notice what is being said about her by a prominent Catholic magazine:

“Providence does not always speak loudly, but in moments like this, it whispers—and sometimes more. Charlie’s words—'I’m this close [to becoming Catholic],' his openness to Mass with his family, his respect for Mary—show a man drawn to the Church. Erika’s life now carries that trajectory forward. Through her, many are watching not only his political legacy, but his spiritual one. ...if she [Erika Kirk] can hold firm, honoring her Catholic faith while embracing all Christian alliances, something beautiful could emerge: a real unity [ecumenism] among Christians, not based on uniformity, but on shared faith in Christ and a common moral purpose. We are living in a time heavy with symbolism: a Catholic Pope from the New World, and now a Catholic woman at the heart of one of the largest youth movements in American history… ...may Turning Point USA under her influence become more than a movement—may it become a place where all who love Christ, Catholic and Protestant alike, stand together not as rivals, but as companions in the battle for truth, for life, and for the soul of America and the world. We all need to be praying for Erika. I myself am holding my breath. Nervous, yes—but praying for [eccumenical] unity.” (see here)

The article continues by highlighting Charlie’s openness to Catholicism—his attendance at Mass with his family, his respect for Mary—and portrays Erika as the heir to his spiritual trajectory, charged with uniting Catholics and Protestants under one banner. Erika herself openly acknowledges her family’s long Catholic lineage and her Jesuit education (see here).

The Long Game Comes Into View

From the slow construction of liberalism as the Protestant “boogeyman,” to Trump’s role as the "savior" figure, to Charlie Kirk’s ecumenical crusade and Erika’s Jesuit connections, a clear pattern emerges. Rome has played both sides of the political divide masterfully, using cultural wars to reconcile Protestants to the Vatican’s leadership, all while disguising its hand.

As we continue to trace the unfolding events surrounding Charlie Kirk’s “death” and its aftermath, this ecumenical agenda will become even more evident. What may appear as a grassroots conservative revival is, in reality, a carefully orchestrated return to Rome.

Who Are Charlie & Erika Kirk?

The story of Charlie and Erika Kirk is anything but spontaneous or grassroots. Their network of political and religious connections points to deliberate placement rather than chance. Their meteoric rise isn’t the story of two “ordinary” activists rising through passion and grit—it’s the story of well-connected insiders strategically elevated into positions of influence. Let’s examine the evidence.

Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk’s father, Robert W. Kirk, was an architect whose firm is credited with designing the Trump Tower in New York City, among other high-profile projects (see here, here and here). This establishes a longstanding professional tie between the Kirk family and Donald Trump—before Charlie ever entered the political spotlight. This fact alone suggests that Robert Kirk’s proximity to Trump offered entry channels, introductions, or even access to financial support for Charlie’s future initiatives. It’s not far-fetched to imagine that this connection was leveraged, overtly or covertly, to help build Charlie’s platform. Yet Charlie offers the following origin story about his activism:

"When I first started this, I was 18. No idea what I was doing. No connections. No money..." (see here)

Compelling as that sounds, is that really the entire truth? The family’s high profile financial status and architectural links to Trump suggest a different picture than “no connections” and "no money".

Turning Point USA: Not a Pure Grassroots Start

Charlie Kirk did not launch his movement from scratch. He co-founded Turning Point USA in 2012 with Bill Montgomery, an influential marketing entrepreneur who already had significant financial resources and networks (see here). Additionally, TPUSA’s funding has consistently come from major conservative donors and foundations (e.g., Bradley Foundation, Donors Trust, Foster Friess) rather than purely organic small-dollar grassroots funding.

These facts show that Turning Point was never purely “grassroots”; it was built with establishment-level capital, influence, networked backing, and possibly political patronage.

Given the Kirk–Trump architectural connection, one cannot rule out the possibility that Robert Kirk used his Trump ties to smooth or secure paths for Charlie’s early funding or platform, especially considering that Charlie would later become one of Trump’s most vocal promoters on the road to the presidency.

Kirk’s Catholic/Ecumenical Leanings & Staff Connections

It is interesting that Kirk’s involvement in conservative political activism began after attending the Youth Empowerment Day at Benedictine University, a Catholic Benedictine institution in Illinois, which helped catapult him toward his later career (see here).

From public statements and internal practices, Kirk was openly ecumenical and often promoted Roman Catholicism. He consistently praised Catholic figures, celebrated Catholic symbols, and integrated both Catholic and Mormon personnel into his circle. Consider the following examples:

• Marriage advice panel:

  “Religious men check a lot of the boxes that you guys are looking for. You’re looking to find a man in the West and it’s your number one priority, and you were given a random selection of like a Catholic man or a femboy atheist, you would take the Catholic.” (YouTube panel discussion)

  
  

• Ecumenical stance:

  “I'm even very close to my local priest Father Klein, great guy... I just want to say again. Here on the Charlie Kirk Show, we’re very ecumenical… Catholics are just fabulous in so many different ways.” (The Charlie Kirk Show)

  
  

  “Some of my greatest friends in the world are Catholic… I go to Catholic Mass every once in a while. … I’m open-minded, but I’m not there yet.” (The Charlie Kirk Show)

  
  

  “I’m not saying that they’re contradictory [Catholicism and Evangelicalism], but your goal should not be to bring people to a specific sect of Christianity. … The goal is bring people to Jesus.” (Discussion Panel)

  
  

• Praise of Catholic devotion and Mary:

  “We as Protestants and Evangelicals under-venerate Mary… Mary was clearly important to early Christians… Mary is the solution to toxic feminism.” (The Charlie Kirk Show)

  
  

• Admiration for Catholic liturgy and tradition:

  “Many young men are going back to church… they are attending Catholic Mass… they want something that has lasted… something that is ancient and beautiful.” “I don’t need a worship song with electric guitar and smoke. I want to feel holy… I enjoy the holiness, beauty, pageantry, structure, tradition, and reverence [of the Catholic Church].” (on the Tucker Carlson show)

  
  

• Favorable remarks toward Mormons:

  “I love how Mormons send missionaries around the world… Half my team is Mormon.” (at UVU just before the shooting)

  
  

• Catholic/Jesuit ties in personnel:

  Erika Kirk – Charlie's "widow", current TPUSA CEO, Jesuit educated at Regis University.

  Drew Messick – educated at Jesuit College Preparatory School of Dallas.

  Mica Mosbacher – board member of Strake Jesuit Preparatory School (Houston).

  Vivek Ramaswamy – Jesuit-educated (St. Xavier High School, Cincinnati), frequent TPUSA guest and ally.

  Candace Owens – publicly converted to Roman Catholicism and has testified about Kirk’s interest in doing the same.

  Jack Posobiec – a devout Catholic, frequent collaborator and close associate of Kirk, often appearing alongside him at major events and on his program.

  Vice President JD Vance – a devout Catholic married to a Hindu woman, hosted the Charlie Kirk Show for a single segment (after Charlie's "death") in honor of his longtime friendship with the Kirks.

  
  

• Testimony of John Yep (President of Catholics for Catholics and a close friend of Charlie):

  John Yep has stated publicly that Charlie confided in him his desire to convert to Roman Catholicism and that their private conversations often revolved around faith and the Church. Yep frequently appeared on Charlie’s show as a Catholic representative and ally, underscoring Kirk’s close relationship with devout Catholic figures (see here).

  
  

• Candace Owens’ testimony:

  In a widely circulated video statement following Charlie’s death, Candace Owens claimed that Charlie was "praying the rosary and going to mass". She recounted how Charlie had told her of his interest in converting to Catholicism. She described his admiration for the Catholic faith and his serious contemplation of joining the Church — a striking admission coming from one of his closest public allies and friends (see here). It is also important to consider Owens’s words regarding her own spiritual journey. Raised as a Protestant, her recent conversion to Catholicism has drawn a lot of attention. In 2024, she posted the following message to social media: “Recently, I made the decision to go home. There is of course so much more that went into this decision and that I plan to share in the future...”  Her curious choice of words—particularly her reference to “going home”—was accompanied by the following picture:

  
  

  

  
  

  Could it be that Candace was, in fact, a long-time closet Catholic, and that “going home” signified a public acknowledgment of a faith she had quietly held for years? And could Charlie have been following a similar path—another closet Catholic who was slowly, yet deliberately acclimating the public to his true religious leanings?

• Promotion of Vatican Pilgrimage:

  The Charlie Kirk Show website features an article titled “Why Evangelicals Should Visit the Vatican,” encouraging evangelicals to make pilgrimages to the Vatican for “spiritual inspiration” (see here).

  
  

Following Kirk’s death, Cardinal Müller, a senior adviser to the pope, publicly referred to Kirk as “a martyr for Christ,” while multiple Catholic outlets began circulating reports of Kirk’s alleged near-conversion to Catholicism (see here). Around the same time, Turning Point USA invited Catholic commentator Michael Knowles to guest-host a Minnesota event, where he opened with the Catholic Sign of the Cross and a prayer to St. Michael the Archangel (see here). Undoubtedly, this distinctly Catholic moment signals the direction TPUSA will be charting in the days ahead.

Platforming False Prophets and Teachers (NAR/Charismatic)

Kirk has consistently platformed and promoted leading figures from the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) and wider Charismatic movement, many of whom are known for false prophecies, prosperity gospel teachings, or ecumenical compromise with Rome. Notable examples include:

• Sean Feucht – worship leader and NAR activist, frequently featured at TPUSA Faith events and rallies.

  
  

• Dutch Sheets – influential NAR prophet associated with the “Appeal to Heaven” movement.

  
  

• Lance Wallnau – self-proclaimed prophet who claimed Trump was God’s “anointed Cyrus.”

• Mario Murillo – revivalist preacher within the NAR orbit, known for political prophetic rallies.

• Bill Johnson (Bethel Church) – a central figure in NAR theology, promoted through TPUSA Faith platforms.

• Che Ahn – prominent NAR apostle and co-founder of “The Call,” platformed through shared events.

• Hank Kunneman – “prophet” known for false Trump prophecies, welcomed in the same movement Kirk amplifies.

• Greg Locke – charismatic preacher associated with deliverance theatrics, hosted alongside Kirk’s network.

Kirk’s willingness to align himself with these figures, give them national stages, and merge political activism with their prophetic rhetoric reflects a deliberate strategy of blending Christian nationalism with Charismatic/NAR revivalism, which is deeply intertwined with Rome’s broader ecumenical agenda (see here).

Given all this, it’s not unreasonable to conclude that Kirk was trained, cultivated, and deployed by higher-ups with an agenda: to use partial truths, cultural war issues, and ecumenical appeals to steer conservative Christian America gradually into Roman Catholic error.

Erika Kirk

Erika Kirk is not a random successor. She entered the public eye long before Charlie’s death and came with a powerful toolkit. To begin with, she comes from a long line of Roman Catholics, and her mother, Lori Frantzve, worked for both Homeland Security and the Department of Defense (see here). Academically, Erika holds a double major in Political Science and International Relations as well as a Juris Master in American Legal Studies (see here).

In a 2012 interview, Erika is quoted as saying:

“I’ve been able to travel to the Pentagon. I’ve been able to meet General [Hugo E.] Salazar, who’s actually out here in Arizona. So there’s a lot of things that have been going on, from working in the military to traveling…” (see here).

She has also publicly highlighted her extensive experience in modeling, acting, and casting, stating:

“I’ve been in the entertainment industry since I was 13 years old. I’ve been behind the camera, in front of the camera… a model and actress, host… a casting director for different TV networks” (see here).

Erika also competed in the Miss USA beauty pageant after receiving a personal invitation from the organization, which at the time was owned by Donald Trump (see here). She was prominently featured in the swimsuit segments and ultimately won the title of Miss Arizona.

Following Charlie’s “death,” religious and conservative media have cast Erika in the mold of a new “Esther” figure—ushering in revival under Trump's Christian presidency (see below videos). Some outlets and influencer circles, including Kayleigh McEnany, have publicly referred to her as “the Esther of our time.” Shortly thereafter, Erika was unanimously elected CEO and chair of TPUSA’s board.

Given all this, it is plausible—and perhaps by design—that Erika is being positioned as the heir to Charlie’s spiritual and political mantle, enabled to amplify the movement in ways he could not have while alive. Her media skills, Catholic identity, and strategic narrative framing make her an especially useful instrument in an ecumenical and political realignment that will perhaps also involve a national reconciliation between Democrats and Republicans. Let me remind you once more of the earlier quote written by an influential Catholic author:

"...if she [Erika Kirk] can hold firm, honoring her Catholic faith while embracing all Christian alliances, something beautiful could emerge: a real unity [ecumenism] among Christians, not based on uniformity, but on shared faith in Christ and a common moral purpose. We are living in a time heavy with symbolism: a Catholic Pope from the New World, and now a Catholic woman at the heart of one of the largest youth movements in American history… ...may Turning Point USA under her influence become more than a movement—may it become a place where all who love Christ, Catholic and Protestant alike, stand together not as rivals, but as companions in the battle for truth, for life, and for the soul of America and the world. We all need to be praying for Erika. I myself am holding my breath. Nervous, yes—but praying for [eccumenical] unity." (see here)

Jesuit Educated: Why It Matters

Many will read this and object: “Having a Jesuit education does not make you a conspirator.” True — countless Jesuit-trained individuals live honest lives, teach in classrooms, serve hospitals, or minister quietly in parish ministries. But within the Jesuit educational ecosystem, there is a hidden architecture: professors, mentors, and scouts who quietly monitor, cultivate, and select those deemed promising for positions of power. In that system, bright, beautiful, ambitious, and talented alumni are rarely left to chance. The words of former President Bill Clinton, who attended Jesuit Georgetown University, help us appreciate this reality—as does the public praise of President Barack Obama for the same institution.

The Scout-Mentor Model Inside Jesuit Universities

• Jesuit institutions pride themselves on cura personalis (“care for the person”)—but, in elite circles, this can be code for careful oversight. Professors, administrators, and campus clergy often identify students with unusual charisma, intelligence, or influence potential, then quietly groom them.

  
  

• These scouting professors may subtly guide chosen students into networks, internships, scholarships, and elite “leadership” tracks. The grooming process can include ideological shaping, alignment with Vatican priorities, and strategic introduction into political, media, or philanthropic spheres.

  
  

• Once “tapped,” a student may receive insider access, favorable mentoring, or invitations to hidden “inner circles” of influence. Over time, the outward-friendly “Ignatian formation” mask conceals a deeper alignment with ecclesiastical or geopolitical goals.

  
  

Given Erika Kirk’s combination of beauty, media savvy, political affiliation (through her mom), military training, and Jesuit education at Regis University (a Jesuit institution), one can reasonably hypothesize that she did not simply “happen” into her role, but was very likely prepared for it.

Kissinger’s Martini Remark and Jesuit Power Behind the Scenes

Henry Kissinger’s famous remark about the Georgetown martini is very telling:

“The hand that mixes the Georgetown [University] martini is time and again the hand that guides the destiny of the Western world.”

Kissinger's subtle revelation exposes the real undercurrents of global powerplay. Jesuit Georgetown (and analogous Jesuit institutions) serve as salons of influence, where the elites mix, converse, plot, and position themselves—while outwardly maintaining academic respectability. In that milieu, the public face is civility, while the hidden face is strategy.

The Trump–Jesuit Nexus

The Trump family itself exemplifies how Jesuit formation opens doors. Donald Trump attended Fordham University, a Jesuit institution, before transferring to Wharton (see here). His children’s connections run even deeper:

• Eric Trump graduated from Georgetown University’s McDonough School of Business with a degree in finance and management (see here).

  
  

• Tiffany Trump earned her J.D. from Georgetown Law (see here).

  
  

• Ivanka Trump attended Georgetown University for two years before completing her studies at Penn (see here).

  
  

And when Maryanne Trump Barry, Donald’s sister, passed away in 2023, her funeral was held at St. Ignatius Loyola in Manhattan—a Jesuit parish. Thirteen priests participated in the service, including Jesuit Rev. Joseph “Joe” Parkes, who spoke of her as "a lovely woman" and emphasized her generosity, particularly towards the Jesuit-run schools. "She certainly helped the Jesuits out," he said, noting her extraordinary contributions (see here and here). Regarding her support of Jesuit institutions, a wikipedia entry for Maryanne Trump Barry notes she “gave $4 million to the Jesuit Fairfield University to fund scholarships and endow the university’s Center for Ignatian Spirituality” (see here).

The symbolism is unmistakable: from education to eulogy, the Trumps are entwined with Jesuit institutions.

The Broader Web: Jesuit Connected Elite Figures

The same pattern extends even furthur:

• JD Vance (as U.S. Vice President) met with Pope Francis at the Vatican just one day before Francis's death (see here). Less than a month later, he traveled to Rome AGAIN for a private audience with Pope Leo XIV—the newly elected pontiff—an engagement reported by Vatican News and the U.S. bishops’ news service on May 19, 2025 (see here). (For context, he had briefly met Pope Francis at the Vatican a month earlier on April 20, 2025.)

  
  

• Major tech figures—Mark Zuckerberg, Melinda Gates, Elon Musk, CEOs of Google and Apple—have all visited the Vatican or met with the pope. These pilgrimages are often framed as moral or cultural gestures, but they also signal partnership with Rome.

  
  

• Tony Fauci, "America's Doctor", who served across multiple administrations, stands as yet another example of Jesuit formation shaping global influence. A proud graduate of Regis High School and the College of the Holy Cross—both Jesuit institutions—Fauci has often credited his Jesuit education for molding his “moral framework.” His reverence for that training is not merely nostalgic; it reflects the deeper influence of an order that prizes obedience, rationalism, and the subtle art of persuasion.

  
  

• The Gates family, too, is steeped in Jesuit connections. In a 2012 TEDx talk, Melinda Gates revealed that her great-uncle was a Jesuit priest (see here). In a 2025 interview, she even admitted she leaned on Jesuit thinkers to reconcile her Catholic faith with her stance on reproductive health—pointing to Notre Dame scholars and heavily citing Father Richard Rohr, whom she described as "a very liberal Jesuit priest" (see here). Beyond words, the Gates Foundation poured nearly $19 million in 2003 into establishing and expanding Cristo Rey Jesuit High Schools across the US (see here).

  
  

  [As an aside, it’s worth noting that Bill Gates is perhaps one of the most publicly criticized figures in the world when it comes to vaccine mandates and experimental bio-medical programs (e.g. MRNA). Ironically, his fiercest critics are Trump’s own supporters, who view Gates as the very face of technocratic overreach. Yet in September of this year, Gates joined Donald Trump at a White House summit with Big Tech executives, where Trump publicly endorsed Gates’s technology-driven vaccine initiatives (even promising to fund it with government money), and Gates, in turn, praised Trump’s Operation Warp Speed as a model of “efficient innovation” (see here and here). Such a surprising alliance raises the following question: How does the man who vowed to “drain the swamp” end up applauding and supporting the very globalists he once condemned? The answer becomes clear when viewed through the lens of Jesuit strategy and feigned hostility.]

  
  

Why Jesuit Education Is Strategic, Not Coincidental

Putting these threads together, the Jesuit connection is not incidental—it is structural. When someone is Jesuit educated:

1. They walk in the corridors of elite networks (Catholic universities, Vatican-linked circles, Jesuit alumni associations).

   
   

2. They internalize a form of intellectual discipline emphasizing rhetoric, subtle persuasion, and moral framing—useful for media, politics, and theological justification.

   
   

3. They become candidates for selection, not just education—those with talent are quietly advanced into roles where the Church (and Jesuit apparatus) benefits.

   
   

4. They carry legitimacy—a Jesuit education is often publicly respected, providing façade credibility while masking deeper alignment.

Again, to those who argue that “Jesuit education is innocent,” I grant that many Jesuit-educated people are sincere, faithful, and unconnected to hidden agendas. But the pattern of selective grooming, institutional access, and elite networking suggests that, for some, Jesuit schooling is a pipeline—not just to service and scholarship, but to strategic placement. If America’s political and religious elite are agents of Rome, then being Jesuit educated is no small thing—it could be one of the most efficient credentials in the Jesuit–Vatican playbook.

In Erika Kirk’s case, her Jesuit education provides plausible cover: she can present herself as a sophisticated Christian leader while being a conduit of Vatican-Jesuit influence within Protestant circles. Erika’s alignment with Jesuit formation means she may have already been groomed and selected to lead a movement that marries Protestant activism with Catholic influence.

Why Fake A Martyrdom?

When analyzing any high-profile event, the key question is simple: Who benefits? In the case of Charlie Kirk’s supposed “assassination,” the answer may lie not in the chaos of the moment, but in the long-term strategy that has been slowly unfolding for over a decade—a strategy that intertwines religion, politics, and psychological warfare.

Charlie Kirk’s meteoric rise was never merely about political punditry. As the head of Turning Point USA, Kirk’s role was to merge Protestant and Catholic energies into a single, ecumenical front—a movement aligned with Vatican goals but cloaked in patriotic, conservative rhetoric. By constructing liberalism and the LGBTQ agenda as the great existential “enemy,” Rome and its political allies successfully channeled Protestant outrage away from itself and toward a visible, cultural foe. In this war, Kirk was a carefully placed general.

But every movement needs a catalyst—a moment of emotional shock that transforms a political figure into a near-religious symbol. For centuries, the Church of Rome has understood the power of martyrs. Martyrdom softens resistance, generates instant solidarity, and turns leaders into icons. In one night, a controversial activist can become a sanctified hero, immune to criticism and capable of galvanizing millions around a single cause.

The feigned assassination of Charlie Kirk served several strategic purposes simultaneously:

1. Transfiguring Kirk from Political Strategist to Martyr-Saint

In death—or rather, in the illusion of death—Kirk’s image could be elevated beyond the realm of political squabbles. His “miraculous death” narrative—a high-powered bullet should have passed cleanly through his body (and potentially struck those standing behind him), but didn’t—positioned him as a providential figure with a divine mandate. The language surrounding this event was deliberately supernatural, as seen in the following Turning Point USA social media post (via Fox News):

“I want to address some of the discussion about the lack of an exit wound with Charlie. I’m usually not interested in delving into most of this kind of online chatter, and I apologize this is somewhat graphic, but in this case, the fact that there wasn’t an exit wound is probably another miracle, and I want people to know … He spoke to the surgeon. ‘He said the bullet “absolutely should have gone through, which is very very normal for a high-powered, high-velocity round. I’ve seen wounds from this caliber many times and they always just go through everything. This would have taken a moose or two down, an elk, etc.’ ‘It was an absolute miracle that someone else didn’t get killed,’ the doctor told him. ‘His bone was so healthy and the density was so so impressive that he’s like the man of steel. It should have just gone through and through. It likely would have killed those standing behind him too.’ ‘Even in death, Charlie managed to save the lives of those around him,’ Kolvet wrote. ‘Remarkable. Miraculous.’”

This language is not accidental—it mirrors the Catholic tradition of elevating martyrs as instruments of God’s will.

2. Launching Erika Kirk as the Ecumenical Bridge

Erika Kirk, a Jesuit-educated cradle Catholic, was strategically placed to inherit her husband’s movement through his sudden, dramatic assassination.

3. Cementing TPUSA’s Legacy and Expanding Its Reach

Death creates urgency. “A martyr’s movement” is harder to critique than a living activist. The event re-energized TPUSA’s base and created a national spiritual revival, which is still ongoing.

4. Advancing the Vatican’s Long Game

As laid out earlier, Rome’s strategic manipulation of political crises follows the Hegelian Dialectic: problem → reaction → solution. In this case, the “problem” was a shocking attack on a conservative icon. The “reaction” was nationwide mourning, unity, and outrage. And the “solution”, of course, is a renewed ecumenical alliance rallying under Kirk’s “legacy,” conveniently led by a Jesuit-educated Catholic woman.

In short, the motive wasn’t random. It was the perfect storm of emotion, symbolism, and strategy. In one carefully staged event, the government and religious elites could canonize Kirk, launch Erika, unite warring factions of the Church via manufactured revival, and advance a global ecumenical agenda—all while silencing dissenters under the moral shield of “martyrdom.” Finally, and very importantly, it served to distract the public from a key issue that has been persistently plaguing Trump's presidency, the Epstein files. On the same day of Kirk's "assassination" (Sept. 10, 2025), the U.S. Senate voted 51–49 to block a proposal to force public release of the Epstein files (see here). 

So Many Holes in the Official Story

Every government narrative comes with a script — and this one reads like a Hollywood thriller rather than a straightforward report. The FBI’s version of events surrounding the supposed “Tyler Robinson shooting” is riddled with implausibilities, contradictions, and technical impossibilities that seasoned experts in ballistics, forensics, and tactical operations have publicly denounced as “laughable.”

From former Navy SEAL Robert O’Neil to retired military snipers and pathologists, the consensus is growing: the official story doesn’t pass even a basic sniff test. Worse yet, it blatantly violates Occam’s Razor, the principle that the simplest explanation is usually the correct one. Ask yourself — is the official story simple and logical, or unnecessarily convoluted and cinematic? Let’s break down the most glaring anomalies:

1. The Perfect Shot

How did Tyler Robinson — a man who did not attend UVU, had just learned of the event, and had no prior reconnaissance — know exactly where Charlie Kirk’s tent would be pitched, which roof to climb, and the precise line of sight required to make such a sniper-grade shot? No scouting, no inside help, no margin of error. Just perfection!

2. The Magical Backpack

The FBI claims Robinson carried a full-sized 30.06 rifle, extra clothes, and personal effects in a small backpack (circulated in media photos). Experts point out that the rifle’s barrel alone would have protruded by at least a foot, making it impossible to conceal in the way alleged. Was he carrying a rifle or a Mary Poppins bag?

3. Six Seconds of Tactical Fantasy

According to the FBI, Robinson fired the shot, disassembled his rifle, changed into a new outfit, and escaped — all in six seconds. Weapons experts have timed themselves on this exact model: disassembly alone takes nearly a minute, not counting clothing changes. Even elite operators couldn’t pull off what Robinson supposedly did.

4. The Screwdriver Problem

The FBI says they found the rifle fully reassembled in the woods where Robinson abandoned it. But they also claim he left his screwdriver on the campus roof, which would be necessary for both disassembly and reassembly of a Mauser-type rifle. How did he reassemble the gun without the tool? Telekinesis? Additionally, some experts have noted that it takes more than a screwdriver to break down one of these rifles.

5. DNA Games

Why did investigators match DNA found on a towel to DNA on the screwdriver—instead of the rifle itself? How are the towel and screwdriver supposed to prove the shooter’s identity? Why not test the weapon — the most direct piece of evidence? It’s almost as if the “evidence” was arranged to build a narrative, not prove a crime (see here).

6. The Contrived Texts

The alleged messages between Robinson and his "boyfriend" read less like real conversation and more like scripted dialogue (see here). Even more suspicious: the FBI reportedly “intercepted” these texts immediately after the shooting. How often does that happen in real time?

7. The “Transgender” Coincidence

Moments before the shot, Kirk was answering a question about transgender mass shooters from UVU student Hunter Kozak (see here). Meanwhile, prosecutors say the accused, Tyler Robinson, was in a relationship with a transgender partner and exchanged romantic messages with him—details they made public almost immediately. That raises the obvious question: what are the odds that a pointed question about transgender mass shooters would be followed moments later by a shooting personally tied to transgender issues? Coincidence or choreography?

Individually, each of these anomalies is bizarre. Together, they form a cathedral of improbabilities — a story so elaborate that it starts to sound more like a film script than a crime report.

The question practically begs itself: Are we dealing with a lone gunman… or a carefully scripted event designed to manipulate public perception?

The Evidence He Didn’t Die

Once the cracks in the official story begin to show, another possibility emerges—one that many forensic experts, military analysts, and seasoned investigators are now entertaining: Charlie Kirk was never actually killed.

If every proposed bullet trajectory, weapon analysis, and medical explanation fails under professional scrutiny (see here and here), what remains is the most unsettling conclusion of all—the assassination was staged.

This isn’t guesswork. A growing body of visual, physical, and behavioral evidence points to a coordinated illusion rather than a genuine fatal shooting. Consider the following anomalies:

1. The “Blood Squib” Moment

In the key footage of the shooting, Charlie briefly tilts to the side, allowing a dark red satchel-shaped object to become momentarily visible beneath his shirt collar—exactly where a pyrotechnic blood squib might be placed (see here at minute 4:32).

Blood squibs are special effects devices commonly used in films to mimic bullet impacts (see here and here). They consist of a small explosive charge attached to a metal plate, covered by a blood pack. When detonated, they create a convincing burst of “blood” and recoil effect. The position, timing, and visual signature of the burst are more consistent with a squib detonation than a rifle round tearing through flesh. Forensic video analysts have slowed this footage frame-by-frame, noting that the spurting blood emanates from a fixed point near his shirt collar, not from a gaping wound (see here at minute 4:32).

2. The Unnatural Arm Signal

As bodyguards bend over Kirk, preparing to whisk him off the stage, his right arm is briefly glimpsed moving upward on its own, forming what appears to be a deliberate signal—after the moment he supposedly took a 30.06 round through his neck and spine, instantly killing him (see here). How does a mortally wounded man, supposedly paralyzed from the neck down, manage a coordinated hand signal seconds after impact?

3. The Laughing Bodyguard

While the guards are bending over Kirk’s body, one can clearly be seen grinning or laughing (see here). Eyewitnesses noted that none of the bodyguards appeared visibly bloodied anywhere on their body, NOT EVEN THEIR HANDS, despite carrying a man whose carotid artery was supposedly obliterated. No blood smears, no frantic compressions—just oddly calm, almost rehearsed movements.

4. No Blood Trail, No Panic

If Kirk’s carotid artery had been hit, the spray and pooling of blood would have been immediate and uncontrollable. Instead, the concrete pavement leading to the SUV is spotless. There is simply no blood trail.

5. No TCCC Performed

If Charlie Kirk truly sustained a gunshot wound to the neck, what happened immediately afterward makes little sense. Professional bodyguards—especially those protecting high-profile figures—are extensively trained in TCCC (Tactical Combat Casualty Care), the gold standard for responding to battlefield trauma. These are not random first-aid steps; TCCC is a precise, time-consuming procedure designed to prevent the victim from bleeding out before evacuation.

The process typically unfolds in the following critical stages:

• Securing the scene and returning fire if under threat—ensuring safety before touching the casualty.

  
  

• Assessing responsiveness and airway patency, including tilting the head, jaw thrusts, or inserting a nasopharyngeal airway.

• Controlling massive hemorrhage, usually with direct pressure or a hemostatic dressing applied to the wound.

  
  

• Managing breathing, sealing any chest wounds and ensuring the casualty can ventilate properly.

• Preventing shock, by laying the victim flat, elevating the legs if possible, and maintaining body temperature with a trauma blanket.

  
  

• Monitoring circulation and preparing for evacuation, which includes stabilizing the neck, immobilizing the patient, and maintaining continuous assessment.

  
  

Even when executed quickly, this takes at least five minutes—and usually much longer—especially for a neck wound, which carries a high risk of airway obstruction, carotid rupture, or spinal trauma. Bodyguards trained in this method would have immediately dropped to their knees, applied pressure to the wound, and coordinated communication with medical responders, all while maintaining a defensive perimeter.

Yet, in the footage, none of this happens. There’s no visible pressure applied to the neck, no airway management, no trauma gauze, no attempt at stabilization—nothing resembling TCCC protocol. Instead, the bodyguards rush Kirk’s limp body straight to the SUV within mere seconds, as though following a script rather than an emergency response.

Why were standard lifesaving procedures ignored? Why was rapid removal prioritized over medical care? These are not the actions of trained professionals responding to a catastrophic injury—they are the movements of actors clearing a stage.

6. Missing High-Definition Footage

TPUSA uses ultra high-definition cameras placed both in front of and behind the stage. These would instantly reveal bullet trajectory, entry/exit wounds, and much more. So why hasn’t this footage been released to the public? What are they hiding?

7. Paving Over the Evidence

Within days, the UVU campus had concrete pavers installed directly over the crime scene (see here). No long-term forensic analysis, no preservation for independent review. Just buried — literally.

8. Ballistics Defy Physics

A 30.06 rifle round can tear through steel plates of considerable thickness (~0.42–0.50 inches). The FBI and surgeon claim the bullet lodged in Kirk’s spine after passing through his neck. Andrew Kolvet of TPUSA declared it “a miracle — Charlie is a man of steel.” But physics doesn’t take miracles into account. A shot like that would have decapitated him or left a gaping exit wound, not a conveniently “lodged” bullet (see here and here).

9. The Missing Boom

No witnesses reported the unmistakable thunderous boom of a 30.06 rifle fired in an amphitheater (see here). This is not a small-caliber pop — it’s deafening. Yet somehow, barely anyone flinched.

10. The Blood That Wasn’t

Pathologists have noted that a transected carotid artery produces thin, bright red, high-pressure spray, like a released hose clamp. Medical trauma texts describe bright-red, oxygenated blood ejecting in pulsatile jets under arterial pressure (see here, here, and here). What was seen on video was thick, dark red fluid — nothing like arterial blood. The spray pattern was wrong, the color was wrong, and the quantity was suspiciously controlled. No visible blood spatter appears on the tent’s white wall or on any nearby stage surfaces where you’d ordinarily expect it.

11. Erika Kirk’s Performance

Many behavior analysts—including retired interrogators and grief counselors—have publicly remarked on Erika Kirk’s emotional affect in her first TPUSA video and at the memorial (see here). Rather than exhibiting raw grief, shock, or emotional dysregulation, she appeared calm, rehearsed, and at times even joyful.

Several experts noted classic “performed grief” microexpressions—quick, inconsistent flashes of sadness between otherwise composed facial control. In simpler terms: it looked like acting.

12. CGI and Video Anomalies

Professional CGI artists and video forensic experts have identified digital overlays, masking effects, and motion inconsistencies in the publicly released footage. In some frames, the entry wound appears superimposed, "floating" on the neck rather than tracking naturally with its movement (see here). Others point out strange object shifts and pixelation anomalies in the tent area, suggesting post-production editing (see here). The kind of editing that’s used when footage needs to sell an illusion.

13. Silenced Witnesses

Perhaps most disturbing, one of the early witnesses giving an on-scene interview was suddenly whisked away mid-sentence by a group of unidentified men (see here). Since then, that individual has not reappeared in any media coverage.

Why suppress eyewitness accounts—unless they contradict the script?

14. The Medical Black Hole

Where are the hospital records? The official autopsy? The surgeon’s detailed statement? Why not go public with these documents—especially in the case of such a high-profile shooting? All we have is a brief claim that the bullet lodged miraculously in Kirk's spine and that “he’s a man of steel.” No independent doctors have corroborated this. No medical reports have been released. For an event of this magnitude, the complete medical silence is deafening.

Each of these anomalies could be dismissed in isolation as “strange coincidences.” But when the supposed cause of death is medically impossible, the physical evidence inconsistent, the behavioral cues rehearsed, and the video footage manipulated, a singular conclusion begins to rise to the surface: The assassination was staged. Charlie didn’t die. What America witnessed, wasn't tragedy; it was performance.

Manufacturing Martyrs Through Staged Assassinations: First Trump, Then Charlie

As Sun Tzu taught in The Art of War, “appear weak when you are strong.” This timeless strategy of psychological warfare has been wielded by dynasties and empires for many centuries. To win a nation’s heart and loyalty, a political movement must manufacture vulnerability—making itself appear besieged through orchestrated attacks, public persecution, or even symbolic martyrdom. When leaders emerge from the crucible of blood and defeat, they cease to be politicians and become iconic heroes. Lately, the scriptwriters of empire have been recycling this play with eerie precision.

The Trump “Assassination Attempt”

When Donald Trump emerged from the rally stage in Butler, Pennsylvania, with a streak of blood curving down his cheek, the image was too perfect. A camera-ready wound, a still frame meant to be immortalized, shared, and worshiped. Within minutes, the photo flooded social media feeds like a sacred icon: the wounded savior, head lifted against the storm, hand raised in defiance.

But something about that blood told another story.

An independent review using ChatGPT Pro, a model frequently used for forensic image analysis, was conducted on the official photograph. The analysis revealed several anomalies inconsistent with a genuine gunshot graze.

Investigators prompted ChatGPT Pro to study the image in detail, asking the question:

Does this look more like a wound suffered from an AR-15 grazing—or theatrical makeup, quickly applied?

Why This Does Not Look Like an AR-15 Grazing Wound

1. Lack of Tissue Trauma

A 5.56mm AR-15 round—even on a graze—would cause shredded or torn skin, visible cartilage damage, swelling, or burn-like friction effects. This image shows none of that. The ear is intact. The skin shows no breakage, tearing, or swelling—no secondary trauma or shockwave deformation.

2. Clean, Controlled Blood Trails

Real bleeding from a gunshot graze is messy and unpredictable, following gravity in irregular flows that soak fabric and hair. Here, the blood appears strategically placed in thin, parallel lines—almost like art direction. It stops neatly before the collar, without pooling or saturation.

3. Color and Viscosity

Fresh blood starts bright red, then darkens unevenly as it oxidizes. The blood in Trump’s photo is uniform in tone—thick, glossy, syrup-like—matching theatrical blood used in movies and Halloween prosthetics. It sits on the skin rather than blending or running naturally.

4. Expression and Behavior

Someone grazed by a high-velocity round would exhibit shock—grimacing, muscle tension, sweating, or disorientation. Trump, instead, appears calm and posed: no tension around the eyes or jaw, no pain reaction. He seems fully aware of the photo being captured.

Why It Does Look Like Theatrical Makeup

The blood follows a visually dramatic path, not a medically typical one. It’s minimal enough to be symbolic, not disturbing—designed to evoke emotion and craft an iconic image, like war paint or martyrdom. It could easily be applied in seconds during the 5–7-second huddle on stage.

Final Verdict

The image lacks the physiological traits of a high-velocity grazing wound but bears all the hallmarks of intentional staging:

• Controlled blood

• Intact anatomy

• No real tissue trauma

• Perfect photographic drama

  
  

ChatGPT’s forensic conclusion placed the probability at 95% or higher that the “wound” was artificially enhanced or entirely staged. The only evidence that could challenge that verdict—medical imaging, surgeon testimony, or video of the exact impact—remains conspicuously absent.

In short, the photo was designed not to document trauma but to create a legend.

Propaganda in Red

The blood streak across Trump’s face wasn’t random — it said, “The enemy tried to destroy me, but I’m chosen.” And millions believed it. Overnight, Trump’s base hardened like steel. Donations spiked and social media exploded with cries of divine protection. Even critics admitted: the optics were flawless.

Trump went from politician to martyr in a single image — a “man of destiny,” sanctified by gunfire that may never have existed.

The Pattern Repeats

Sound familiar? It should. Because Charlie Kirk’s “assassination” played the same chord, just in a different key.

Both men — Trump and Kirk — are figureheads of a movement that thrives on persecution optics. Both “attacks” lacked authentic trauma, both had instantly managed press rollouts, and both conveniently elevated their subjects from celebrity to saint.

Trump’s staged graze and Kirk’s squib-fueled collapse are twin chapters in the same playbook: controlled crises engineered to unify the flock and redirect suspicion. The goal isn’t death — it’s devotion.

When your enemy “tries to kill” your hero and fails, your loyalty to that hero becomes unbreakable. You’ll defend him with religious fervor, because in your mind, he’s already bled for the cause.

Governments and intelligence agencies have long known this formula. Create a false martyr, amplify it through controlled media, and the emotional response will override logic. The masses won’t ask for medical reports or ballistic data; they’ll repost the photo or video with tears in their eyes.

That’s not politics — that’s psychological conditioning. Trump’s “blood of defiance” and Kirk’s “sacrifice on stage” were not accidents of fate; they were signals — carefully lit matches dropped into a powder keg of national sentiment. Both were designed to bind the believer to the brand.

And now the question looms: If both martyrdoms were staged… who wrote the script? The patterns—timing, symbolism, and the seamless fusion of politics with liturgy—point in a familiar direction. As I’ve documented repeatedly in my research, the Jesuit order of Rome operates as the quiet director behind such pageantry, orchestrating the script while politicians and pundits perform it for the crowd.

Candace Owens’ Role in the Charlie Kirk Psyop

Candace Owens has drawn significant attention in the weeks following Kirk’s assassination for alleging that Israel was responsible. This claim has fueled rising waves of dangerous anti-Jewish sentiment. Owens, a self-identified Catholic, continues to command major media visibility—exposure that rarely develops organically or by chance, as demonstrated earlier. So what's her role within the greater psyop?

First, it must be noted that Papal Rome has a long and troubling history of persecuting the Jewish people. Throughout the centuries, Papal Rome’s influence has been intertwined with numerous episodes of such persecution—most notably the Crusades, the Inquisitions, and the many pogroms that devastated Jewish communities across Europe. Historians have also noted the close relationship between the Catholic hierarchy and the rise of Nazi Germany. The Zentrum—the Catholic Centre Party—played a key role in parliamentary decisions that gave Adolf Hitler dictatorial power (by voting to pass the Enabling Act). The 1933 Reichskonkordat, a formal treaty between the Holy See and Nazi Germany, granted the regime diplomatic legitimacy. Several leading Nazis had Catholic or Jesuit backgrounds: Joseph Goebbels, the propaganda minister, studied at Jesuit institutions (see here); Heinrich Himmler openly admired the Jesuits’ discipline and organizational methods (see here); and Father Bernhard Stempfle, a Catholic priest, assisted in the writing of Mein Kampf (see here). After the war, various Catholic clerics were directly involved in organizing escape routes—often called the “ratlines”—that allowed many high profile Nazi officials to flee to South America.

In light of this, it appears that Owens is a disinformation specialist and that her role is to craft rhetoric that revives prejudice and animosity toward Jews while redirecting suspicion surrounding Kirk’s so-called “death” away from Rome. To that end, she draws heavily on the present atrocities committed by Israel against the Palestinians—using those tragedies as fuel for her increasingly anti-Jewish narrative.

It must be clearly stated that the historic suffering of the Jewish people does not justify present-day violence against Muslims in the Middle East; and that the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza is both real and deeply tragic. Yet it remains equally important not to project collective guilt onto all Jewish or Israeli individuals for the suffering of Gazans.

Governments may use propaganda or military narratives to rally public sentiment and support (as in the case of the October 7th attack), yet ordinary citizens are often caught in the current rather than directing it. The same caution applies to historical Germany: many were swept up in propaganda and fear, manipulated by powers far above them. And it is wrong to hate all Germans for their unfortunate role in the atrocities that followed.

From this perspective, Owens’s increasingly harsh rhetoric risks reviving old prejudices that could one day be used to justify another wave of persecution—a second Holocaust—against the Jewish people, something Scripture itself foretells. The Bible warns that in the last days, many nations will rise against Israel, and only a faithful remnant of Jews will be preserved (Zech. 12:2–9; 13:8–9; Rom. 11:25–27). Whether intentional or not, such messaging can inflame global hostility toward Jews, leading to this same inevitable Holocaust.

The responsibility of Believers, therefore, is to discern truth from manipulation, to reject hatred in every form, and to pray earnestly for both justice and mercy upon all who are caught in deception.

How Kim Clement’s "Prophecies" Decode the Future

Kim Clement was a charismatic, self-proclaimed prophet within the NAR (New Apostolic Reformation) movement whose "prophetic" predictions are now surfacing with startling accuracy—particularly in relation to Erika Kirk. Since Clement’s passing in 2016, his daughter Donné Clement Petruska has revived his ministry through the House of Destiny platform and YouTube channel, offering commentary and analysis on her father’s archived prophecies.

Many of these prophecies have unfolded with uncanny precision, leading some, as myself, to suspect that Clement was a Jesuit elite with insider knowledge of high-level political and religious agendas. Notably, he had direct access to Donald Trump, according to preacher Lance Wallnau, who credits Clement with arranging a meeting between several preachers and Trump at Trump Tower on December 30, 2015. Clement also visited the Vatican, and later spoke with unusual warmth about Jesuit Pope Francis.

“I have chosen Pope Francis… they will try and assassinate him three times [pope Francis later confirmed at least two assassination attempts].” — The Berean Call

“I saw Pope Francis, a massive spiritual renewal, and a shaking in heaven and on earth.” — Elijah List

“Pope Francis is one of the voices that will speak… he will command… and they will try and assassinate him three times. They will try within to damage him.” — Nebeeseer Blog

These statements reveal Clement’s ecumenical leanings and open support for Rome. To be clear, not all of his prophecies have come to pass or proven accurate. Yet this, too, may have been by design—a deliberate effort to avoid becoming too obvious and thereby attracting unwanted scrutiny or public suspicion.Yet his daughter has recently resurfaced numerous other prophecies that have proven alarmingly accurate. Could these revelations reflect a Jesuit playbook for the near future? And what lessons might we draw to guard ourselves against the coming deception?

Below is a compilation of Clement’s most striking prophecies—many of which appear to be currently unfolding. Perhaps these will shed light on what is planned for the globe in the next few years:

1. “Trump Shall Become a Trumpet” – February 10, 2007 (Redding, California)

“Trump shall become a trumpet. Trump shall become a trumpet. I will raise up the Trump to become a trumpet, and Bill Gates to open up the gate of a financial realm for the church.”

At that time, Donald Trump was known only as a businessman, yet Clement foresaw he would rise as a national “trumpet” used to influence America.

“The Praying President” and “Hot Blood” Prophecy – 2007 (Scottsdale, Arizona)

In the same year, Clement delivered one of his most discussed messages, predicting a “praying president” who would at first appear irreligious:

“There will be a praying president, not a religious one.”“For I will fool the people, says the Lord. I will fool the people. Yes, I will.”“The one that is chosen shall go in, and they shall say, ‘He has hot blood.’”“Yes, he may have hot blood, but he will bring the walls of protection on this country in a greater way.”“The economy of this country shall change rapidly, says the Lord of Hosts.”“I will put at your helm for two terms a president that will pray, but he will not be a praying president when he starts. I will put him in office and then I will baptize him with the Holy Spirit and My power.”

Proponents of Clement identify this “hot-blooded” leader as Trump, citing his temperament, economic impact, and later displays of religiosity.

2. “Two Presidents at One Time” – April 4, 2011 (Capistrano Beach, California)

Clement foretold a season of political confusion:

“There shall be a man who is unknown to you now who shall rise up, and I shall give him the Spirit of David and the anointing of Cyrus… There shall be two presidents at one time.”

Many interpret this as a reference to America’s deep political division and the disputed integrity of the 2020 election—when the nation was sharply divided over who was the rightful leader, Trump or Biden.

3. “Two Terms and the Cry of ‘Impeach!’” – 2014 (Fresno, California)

Clement described a fearless leader who would defend Israel and face fierce opposition:

“This man will throttle the enemies of Israel. This man will throttle the enemies of the West. And this man shall be fearless before them. They will shout, ‘Impeach, impeach!’ but this shall not happen. Then it shall come to pass that this Trump shall become a trumpet for the Lord, and shall serve two terms, a president who shall bring honor to America.”

Clement never specified that the terms would be consecutive—leaving open the possibility of a future return to power.

4. The “Esther” Prophecy – 2011 (Nashville, Tennessee)

Clement predicted the rise of a woman likened to Queen Esther:

“There shall be a woman crowned as Esther, beautiful in eyes; and her eyes shall be so beautiful. Her eyes shall be round and big. I have crowned her... And she shall pour the oil of gladness upon this nation. Schools will be free from danger, shootings, murder, and drug addiction. The cartels will be afraid of a woman. A new party will rise, saying, ‘Christ will reign,’ and we shall not implement socialism.”

His daughter later suggested this could point to Erika Kirk (formerly Miss Arizona), given her crown imagery and Christian influence in the public arena.

5. Israel, Antisemitism, and the Threat of War – 2010

Clement warned of a coming wave of antisemitism and threats against Israel:

“A wave of hatred will arise, but I shall silence their enemies. I shall defend Israel, says the Lord.”

In light of current events and the resurgence of anti-Jewish hostility worldwide, this "prophecy" has taken on renewed significance.

6. “No World War – Yet”

In several broadcasts, Clement insisted:

“They shall cry, ‘World War, World War!’ but it shall not be yet. For the Spirit of the Lord says, I will hold it back for a season while I pour out My Spirit.”

With global tensions escalating across both Europe and the Middle East, talk of a third world war has reached levels unseen in the 21st century. Many now view Clement’s words as describing a temporary restraint—a brief window before full-scale conflict erupts.

7. The Golden Window of Peace and Healing

Clement tied the Esther prophecy to a brief golden age marked by reduced crime, deliverance from addiction, and renewed reverence for God in schools. He described it as a divinely granted respite—a merciful pause for America to repent before greater upheaval.

8. A New Party / Uniparty Realignment

Beginning in 2009 (Chicago), Clement foresaw a political merging:

“Now, I will join hands between Democrats and Republicans and do an unusual thing, says the Spirit of God. ...They will say, ‘This is the American Party.’ I will remove division from among them and they shall say, ‘Christ will reign.’”

Observers connect this to the growing blurring of party lines and bipartisan alliances emerging today.

9. Catholics and Protestants United

Clement predicted that Catholics and Protestants would come together under a shared spiritual revival:

“God’s hand will move within the Roman Catholic Church. Old walls will fall, and My people shall focus again on Christ.”

Many interpret this as anticipating today’s ecumenical movement and the renewed cooperation between Rome and Evangelical leaders.

10. Revival Across America

While Clement did not name a specific starting point, he foresaw a wave of revival spreading “from state to state, from city to city,” transforming society and drawing countless souls to repentance. It would begin in unexpected places, shaking every sector—education, politics, and culture.

11. Arizona: The Source of Global Revival – November 6, 2012 (Phoenix, Arizona)

Clement gave a remarkable prophecy linking Arizona to a future spiritual outpouring (see here):

“I will begin with this city, and I will take the salt of forgiveness, the salt of unity, and the salt of grace, and pour it into the water supply of the cities of Arizona. The waters meant for revival that became impure through religion shall be purified, says the Lord.The soil shall no longer be barren. A revival, restoration, and breakthrough of salvation and deliverance shall take place and multiply in your schools and universities. It shall go into your legal and political systems. They will look to Arizona and say, ‘What has happened?’ and you shall say, ‘Our waters have been purified, says the Lord.’”

This is one of Clement’s most detailed state-specific words and aligns with the Esther–Arizona connection his daughter later emphasized.

12. Season of Recovery and Restoration

Throughout his ministry, Clement emphasized that following turmoil, God would grant a season of mercy:

“There shall be a window of grace, a time to recover and restore what was lost.”

Taken together, Kim Clement’s words paint the picture of a world in transition—a “golden window” (aka golden age) of peace before the storm. His prophecies speak of a hot-blooded leader raised up for two terms, a crowned Esther who brings healing, a politically divided nation uniting, and a revival flowing from Arizona that purifies the waters of the world. Even his praise of Pope Francis and call for unity between Catholics and Protestants reveal a broader theme of global convergence—political, religious, and spiritual (just as prophesied in Revelation).

As the pieces of Clements predictions align—America’s moral shaking, Israel’s trials, ecumenical unity under Rome, and the looming specter of world war—the question becomes impossible to ignore: were these prophecies warnings from God, or a coded preview of the system the Bible calls the Beast?

In the next section, we’ll turn to Scripture itself—to compare these modern "prophecies" with biblical prophecy and discern what may soon come upon the earth.

Where Is All This Going—and What’s the End Game?

As we survey the landscape of prophecy, culture, and geopolitics, it’s essential to root our vision in Scripture first—and then weigh everything through that lens. The New Testament warns that in the last days many will fall away, false teachers will arise, and deception will abound (2 Thess 2:3; 1 Tim 4:1; Mat 24:24). The promise of revival is real—but it always comes amid darkness and never as a sweeping global phenomenon. Jesus said, "strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it” (Mat 7:14). If only a few, not many, are destined for eternal life, then the idea of a worldwide revival ushering millions into the Kingdom—as so often proclaimed by Charismatic circles and the Latter Rain movement—is a deception. True revival is not a mass trend but a holy awakening of the remnant—those who humble themselves, repent, and walk the narrow way that leads to life.

Looking at the current situation, it is highly likely that we are now witnessing the fulfillment of Revelation 13 in real time. This chapter describes two great beasts. The first rises out of the "sea" and represents a religious–political power that fully dominates the nations—Papal Rome (see here). The second emerges “out of the earth”, performing miraculous signs —a symbol of America—and compelling the world to worship the first beast (see here). Clearly, America is rapidly moving into this prophetic role by forging an alliance with Rome, just as predicted—thanks to figures like Charlie Kirk.

Yet this alliance is not merely political—it is spiritual and technological. The same chapter goes on to describe the mark of the beast—a seal of allegiance that unites spiritual deception with economic and technological control (Rev. 13:16–17). In light of modern innovation, Elon Musk’s Neuralink and the merging of humanity with artificial intelligence bear an unsettling resemblance to this prophecy, as the line between man and machine grows ever thinner. Scripture warns that under this coming system, “no man might buy or sell” unless he bears the mark—an ominous glimpse of total submission to a world power claiming divine authority.

Musk’s recent call on X for everyone to “go to church” raises another question: what kind of church? The concern is that such appeals will steer people toward a unified, ecumenical movement—a one-world religious system clothed in Christian language.

Clement’s "prophecies" about America and his prediction of political unity (“the American Party”) take on added weight if we understand the U.S. as the second beast, supporting the first—Rome. Through this lens, political, religious, and technological forces appear to be converging toward a single global purpose.

Prophetic Voices Aligning the Vision

Clement’s words about unity and revival and his references to Catholics and Protestants coming together all fit the emerging pattern of an ecumenical system preparing the way for a one-world faith.

David Wilkerson foresaw this same development decades ago:

“I see rising a super world church. I see the formation of a super world church consisting of liberal ecumenical Protestants and the Roman Catholic Church, joining politically hand in hand to create one of the most powerful religious organizations on earth. … This visible super world church is going to be spiritual in name only; freely using the name of Jesus Christ, but will in fact be antichrist and political in many of its activities. Its leaders … will harass and persecute everyone who does not come under their religious leadership.” (see here)

Wilkerson’s prophecy predicted the coming of a political–religious alliance cloaked in Christianity yet driven by antichrist agendas—a movement that would seek power, suppress dissent, and demand allegiance. Are we close to this point?

Appointments, Alliances & Alarms: Trump, Charles, Tech & Public Rituals

The recent friendship between Donald Trump and King Charles is truly striking. Charles is directly connected to the World Economic Forum and has fully endorsed the Great Reset agenda very publicly throughout the pandemic of 2020. Why would Trump align himself so comfortably with figures championing the very globalism he once vowed to oppose? But it doesn't stop there. At a recent Big Tech meeting hosted at the White House, Mark Zuckerberg sat directly to Trump’s right while Bill Gates sat next to Melania. These globalist technocrats—long aligned with "woke"/progressive causes—were warmly embraced. Trump lavishly praised them while pledging to support their initiatives with government money. More disturbingly, he promised full cooperation with Silicon Valley during the course of his administration. The message is unmistakable: the supposed battle between globalism and nationalism is quickly dissolving before our eyes.

Meanwhile, the “mile-long communion table” event now taking place in Washington, D.C.—an ecumenical gathering known as Awakening the Dawn that seeks to bridge the divide between Catholics and Protestants—raises serious red flags (see below video). Its theme of unity, national grandeur, and the symbolic name itself (“Awakening the Dawn”) recalls the imagery of Lucifer (“son of the morning”). What is being awakened, and to what end?

Videos have also surfaced of an AI-generated “Charlie Kirk” addressing a large church audience in Texas. The symbolism is chilling: necromancy through technology. It represents the threshold of deception where man and machine merge in ministry—a blasphemous counterfeit to the living Spirit of God.

Wearing a Christian Mask: The Devil’s Strategy

Scripture warns that Satan’s greatest weapon is deception through imitation.

“And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.” (2 Cor 11:14-15)

“False christs and false prophets will arise and perform signs and wonders, to lead astray, if possible, the elect.” (Mat 24:24)

The devil will not present himself as evil—he will appear as the "savior". Likewise, his agents will wear the name of Christ while advancing deception. That’s why the mark of the beast will seem reasonable, even righteous. It will come wrapped in Christian rhetoric, justified by unity, safety, and progress.

This is why figures like Elon Musk urging the world to “go to church,” and global leaders calling for unity across faiths, must be viewed with discernment. Such moves may seem spiritual, but they are strategically designed to acclimate humanity to the counterfeit "christ".

My Previous Predictions & Their Convergence

In Trump 2.0: What It Means for America, I warned of a coming brief economic boom, a counterfeit Christian revival, and sudden peace agreements between Russia and Ukraine and between Gaza and Israel. We are now witnessing these very developments begin to unfold. Each new step—from diplomatic breakthroughs to renewed economic optimism—appears to be laying the groundwork for a unified religious–political system, the very structure Scripture describes as deceiving the nations.

This system will likely emerge through the merging of both major political parties, as Democrats and Republicans set aside their differences to form a single uniparty under the banner of unity and moral restoration. Is this why Donald Trump recently urged Christians to “get out and vote,” promising that if they did, “in four more years, you won’t have to vote anymore”? Could this statement be more than political bravado—perhaps a glimpse into the next phase of a prophetic consolidation of power?

What I See Coming

The current phase of ecumenical bridging marked by dialogue and cooperation between all "Christian" sects and denominations will continue to advance under the banner of unity. Once the walls of separation are fully dismantled and the unity complete, universalism will follow: a fusion of Christianity with other world faiths in the name of peace and global solidarity.

From there, a one-world religion will rise—a syncretistic system that blends Christian forms and pagan mysticism with political control. Jesuit theologian Karl Rahner once said, “The Christian of the future will be a mystic, or he will not exist at all.” His words now echo ominously, capturing the shift toward experiential spirituality without biblical truth.

Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA, and Jack Posobiec have all openly advocated for the complete removal of the separation between Church and State, as we have previously shown. They have called for a Christian government run by the Church, insisting that America must return to a theocratic model under Christian authority. This presents a grave question: What state-run church will fill that void once the separation is gone and both church and state are merged?

Will it be Romanism? All signs suggest so—especially considering Kirk’s own public statements expressing hope that the new pope would usher in a “new golden age” for Christianity. If this path continues, we could soon find ourselves under a theocracy run by Rome, forming what David Wilkerson once called a “super world church.”

And what would such a church look like? History gives us a sobering answer. Will it once again persecute dissenters, arresting those who reject its aberrant doctrines? Will home churches be outlawed and Protestant Believers silenced, branded as extremists for refusing to preach a patriotic, nationalistic gospel in the name of unity? The precedent is clear—for centuries Papal Rome burned Protestant dissidents at the stake for so-called heresy. Why should we believe it would be any different now, when Revelation itself foretells that this very power will again make war with the saints?

It is not far-fetched to believe that all of this could unfold within the next five years—in perfect step with the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda. A super world church is rapidly taking shape—ecumenical in spirit, universalist in doctrine, and fully aligned with global governance. I see the mark of the beast arising through this very system, enforced under the banner of faith, unity, and peace, and led by the papal antichrist himself.

Conclusion: A Final Call to the Church: Awake, Obey, Endure

This is not a time for passive observation. It is a time for holy vigilance. The remnant must maintain purity, truth, and holiness. Be spiritually awake—testing every prophecy and every voice by the Word of God (1 Jn 4:1). Pursue righteousness and holiness, even when the world calls it fanaticism (Heb 12:14). Love the truth more than comfort; hold fast to the gospel when compromise is celebrated. Refuse any allegiance that demands loyalty above Christ, in whatever form the “mark” may come.

We are the remnant God has placed in this hour—not to fear, but to shine. In a world seduced by unity without truth, may we be anchored in the unchanging Word of God. The days ahead will test every foundation, but those who build upon Christ will stand when all else falls.

The path before us may grow darker, but the call of God remains the same: “Be ye holy, for I am holy.” Let us be found faithful—vigilant, obedient, and burning with the light of His truth until He comes.