• John Aziza

COVID DEMOCIDE: What They AREN'T Telling You

Updated: Sep 6, 2021

"Democide is a concept proposed by U.S. political scientist Rudolph Rummel to describe the intentional killing of an unarmed or disarmed person by government agents acting in their authoritative capacity and pursuant to government policy or high command." — Wikipedia

Think about it...

What happens when the information you are given ISN’T the whole story? What happens when censorship and suppression are aggressively used to keep you from encountering anything but the "acceptable" narrative? But wait, there's more... What if nearly everything we are being told right now about COVID-19 is downright false? If so, can it be proven?

The purpose of this post is to bring under scrutiny the many discrepancies and lies surrounding the COVID pandemic and to thereby equip you with life saving knowledge. Here's my pledge. All of the evidence submitted here will be gathered from trusted sources that can be easily verified. All I ask in exchange is that you keep an open mind and be willing to think critically about the evidence presented.

COVID-19 PCR tests are scientifically meaningless

The whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” Sars-Cov-2 infection, but the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose. On March 16, 2020 at the media briefing on COVID-19, the WHO Director General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, made the following declaration:

"We have a simple message for all countries: test, test, test.”

This message was spread through headlines around the world, and repeated by Reuters and the BBC. The moderator of Heute Journal— one of the most important news programs in Germany— had the following admonishing words for his audience:

"Test, test, test—that is the credo at the moment, and it is the only way to really understand how much the coronavirus is spreading.”

But what if the instrument used for detecting the virus, the PCR (polymerase chain reaction) test, was never meant to diagnose a single disease? Don't take my word for it. Just have a listen to the inventor of the PCR test, Dr. Kary Mullis, who spoke very openly of this fact in a recorded interview (see here). Since then, and throughout the pandemic response, many other medical professionals and scientists have been making the same discovery (see here and here). So perhaps that's what prompted the World Health Organization to issue a weak "retraction" in respect to PCR testing. Of course, they don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. No. The retraction is carefully formulated to avoid taking any blame for setting up faulty guidelines for testing (see original WHO document here).

Note: Kary Mullis, an outspoken critic of Dr. Anthony Fauci, died only seven months prior to the start of the pandemic. We believe that had he still been alive he would have strongly opposed the PCR test being used to diagnose COVID-19.

The SARS-CoV-2 virus, responsible for COVID-19, was never lab purified, nor was it isolated and given a valid genomic sequence

Here's the proof, excerpted from an excellent article on the matter:


Now the question is this: What is required first for proof of virus isolation? Simple answer: We need to know where the RNA for which the PCR tests are calibrated comes from.

As textbooks (e.g., White/Fenner. Medical Virology, 1986, p. 9) as well as leading virus researchers such as Luc Montagnier or Dominic Dwyer state, particle purification is the separation of an object from everything else that is not that object. For instance, Nobel laureate Marie Curie purified 100 mg of radium chloride in 1898 by extracting it from tons of pitchblende. This process is an essential prerequisite for proving the existence of a virus, and thus to prove that the RNA from the particle in question comes from a new virus.

To use PCR in this process is unwise. The reason for this is that PCR is extremely sensitive, which means it can detect even the smallest pieces of DNA or RNA — but it cannot determine where these particles came from. That has to be determined beforehand.

And because the PCR tests are calibrated for gene sequences (in this case RNA sequences because SARS-CoV-2 is believed to be a RNA virus), we have to know that these gene snippets are part of the looked-for virus. And to know that, correct isolation and purification of the presumed virus has to be executed.

Hence, we have asked the science teams of the relevant papers which are referred to in the context of SARS-CoV-2 for proof whether the electron-microscopic shots depicted in their in vitro experiments show purified viruses.

But not a single team could answer that question with “yes” — and nobody said purification was not a necessary step. We only got answers like “No, we did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification” (see below).

We asked several study authors, “Do your electron micrographs show the purified virus?”, they gave the following responses:

Study 1: Leo L. M. Poon; Malik Peiris. “Emergence of a novel human coronavirus threatening human health” Nature Medicine, March 2020 Replying Author: Malik Peiris Date: May 12, 2020 Answer: “The image is the virus budding from an infected cell. It is not purified virus.”

Study 2: Myung-Guk Han et al. “Identification of Coronavirus Isolated from a Patient in Korea with COVID-19”, Osong Public Health and Research Perspectives, February 2020 Replying Author: Myung-Guk Han Date: May 6, 2020 Answer: “We could not estimate the degree of purification because we do not purify and concentrate the virus cultured in cells.”

Study 3: Wan Beom Park et al. “Virus Isolation from the First Patient with SARS-CoV-2 in Korea”, Journal of Korean Medical Science, February 24, 2020 Replying Author: Wan Beom Park Date: March 19, 2020 Answer: “We did not obtain an electron micrograph showing the degree of purification.”

Study 4: Na Zhu et al., “A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China”, 2019, New England Journal of Medicine, February 20, 2020 Replying Author: Wenjie Tan Date: March 18, 2020 Answer: “[We show] an image of sedimented virus particles, not purified ones.”

Regarding the mentioned papers, it is clear that what is shown in the electron micrographs (EMs) is the end result of the experiment, meaning there is no other result that they could have made EMs from. That is to say, if the authors of these studies concede that their published EMs do not show purified particles, then they definitely do not possess purified particles claimed to be viral. (In this context, it has to be remarked that some researchers use the term “isolation” in their papers, but the procedures described therein do not represent a proper isolation (purification) process. Consequently, in this context the term “isolation” is misused).

Thus, the authors of four of the principal, early 2020 papers claiming discovery of a new coronavirus concede they had no proof that the origin of the virus genome was viral-like particles or cellular debris, pure or impure, or particles of any kind. In other words, the existence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA is based on faith, not fact.

We have also contacted Dr Charles Calisher, who is a seasoned virologist. In 2001, Science published an “impassioned plea…to the younger generation” from several veteran virologists, among them Calisher, saying that:

"[modern virus detection methods like] sleek polymerase chain reaction […] tell little or nothing about how a virus multiplies, which animals carry it, [or] how it makes people sick. [It is] like trying to say whether somebody has bad breath by looking at his fingerprint.”

And that’s why we asked Dr Calisher whether he knows one single paper in which SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and finally really purified. His answer:

"I know of no such a publication. I have kept an eye out for one.”

This actually means that one cannot conclude that the RNA gene sequences, which the scientists took from the tissue samples prepared in the mentioned in vitro trials and for which the PCR tests are finally being “calibrated,” belong to a specific virus — in this case SARS-CoV-2."

What a bombshell! If the virus was never purified, it was never properly isolated, and if it was never isolated, it is simply impossible to give it a valid genomic sequence. To put it simply, SARS-CoV-2 does not exist. And therefore COVID-19 is a phantom. Even worse, it's a well fabricated lie!

Note: Several individuals from the US, Canada, and the EU have filed FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests with their respective countries for the purpose of receiving tangible evidence proving the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Each of these individuals were told that such proof could not be provided to them (see here, here, and here).

So if COVID does not exist, why are so many people getting sick and what exactly are they dying from?

There are many different factors contributing to both the "COVID" infection rate and death toll, such as the following:


Because PCR tests are faulty from the start, false positives are easily generated. Typical respiratory infections such as bronchitis, pneumonia, influenza, tuberculosis, and even the common cold, are now being diagnosed as COVID.


Doctors are required to test all patients admitted for care (see here). Patients who test positive for COVID, but die of other causes such as cancer or kidney failure, are still marked as a "COVID death" (see here).


Medicare is paying hospitals up to $13,000 per COVID diagnosis and up to $35,000 for each patient placed on a ventilator (see here, here, and here). These monetary incentives create an environment rife with malpractice. Intubating a patient and placing them on a mechanical ventilator can seriously jeopardize their health and lead to death (see here).


Since the start of the pandemic, blue and grey face masks have been the staple measure of precaution. Yet these same popular face coverings are coated with nano graphene, a strong, very thin material that is used in fabrication. However, nano graphene is extremely similar to asbestos and is considered harmful to the lungs when inhaled. It has been shown to cause early pulmonary toxicity and long-term health problems (see here, here, and here). Also, the mere fact that face coverings inhibit oxygen intake and force the user to inhale their own bacteria and carbon dioxide gas is a serious reason for concern. Long term use of face masks has been shown to cause severe lung infections (see here).


Back in April of 2020, Remdesiver (a repurposed antiviral drug) was officially recommended by the FDA as the standard of care for CV-19 in ALL American hospitals (see here). There is a common saying that goes like this, "sometimes the cure is worse than the disease". In this case, that saying seems to apply well. Many qualified medical doctors have now come forward to expose the fact that the high death rate in CV-19 patients is due almost exclusively to Remdesiver's nephrotoxicity (see here, here, and here). In other words, Remdesiver is killing them, not COVID!


It is a fact that ventilators are a leading cause in the mortality rate of patients with COVID. Studies have found that over 88% of those undergoing COVID treatment with mechanical ventilation wound up dead (see here, here, here, here, here, and here).


The COVID-19 vaccine is a deadly bioweapon that can cause serious harm to the human body and has been intentionally designed to do just that (see here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, and here). Certainly, many who are currently being hospitalized for "COVID" are experiencing the dire effects of the deadly CV-19 vaccine.


Joe Imbriano, who holds a B.S. in chemistry and biology from the University of California Irvine, has studied the molecular level impact of 5G and made an alarming discovery. 5G’s 60 GHz bandwidth can negatively affect the oxygen we breathe, especially when “beam-forming” (concentrated) around the area associated with our respiratory system, such as our nose and mouth:

“60 GHz is the frequency of oxygen molecule absorption. Oxygen molecules have electrons that they share with each other; oxygen is a diatomic molecule. What we breathe are two oxygen molecules bonded together with the electrons that they share. When the oxygen molecule is hit with 60 GHz frequencies, the orbital resonance of its shared electrons are directly affected. It is those shared electrons that bind to the hemoglobin in our blood. In addition to disrupting oxygen absorption, 5G will alter the iron and magnetite function respectively of the hemoglobin and pineal gland. Hemoglobin and the pineal gland have a magnetic compound within them. The magnetic field disruption is already happening, but, with 5G, this disruption will be more seriously amplified. Hemoglobin is a very complex ferromagnetic compound. If we interfere with the orbital spin properties of diatomic oxygen’s O2 electrons via 5G, our ability to absorb oxygen will be significantly hampered, creating slow suffocation. Because of this additional factor, with or without 5G, people should avoid 60 GHz Wi-Fi systems in any case. At 60 GHz the frequencies also impair the body’s ability to produce vitamin D and melanin. In this context, 5G and the 60 GHz delivery system is an overt attack on the human body.”

After reading this you might be thinking of all the new 5G towers that were installed EVERYWHERE throughout 2020. Or the fact that cell phones, which are held relatively close to the mouth, might have an impact on people's breathing because of the higher than normal radio frequencies and their ability to interact with atmospheric oxygen. This can easily lead to serious breathing complications, radiation poisoning, and other sever harm to the human body, some of which might be incorrectly blamed on COVID. To read more about the dangers of 5G and its link to COVID click here.


Fear is a leading contributor to many diseases and so is stress (see here, here, and here). Those who are "sick with fear" often exacerbate their illness because of the added stress load (see here and here).

Experiencing "COVID", our personal story

The COVID democide has had a very personal and profound impact on our family. In fact, it hit very close to home when my wife's dad and sister were both hospitalized with "COVID" this past July. Sadly, my sister-in-law, a young mother of two and a dedicated wife, didn't survive the ordeal and passed into eternity roughly three weeks after starting treatment. We believe that her treatment was the cause of death, not her sickness.

To help you understand why we feel this way, I must start with what happened to my father-in-law first. I believe this will give you better understanding of what went wrong with Tina, my wife's sister.

Back in November of 2020, I was called upon to drive my father-in-law to the regional hospital in Wasilla Alaska because he was experiencing a really bad cough and difficulty breathing. Once at the hospital, we were pressed by medical staff to get Alex (my father-in-law) tested for COVID, but declined for personal reasons. The doctors conducted a very rudimentary examination of his lungs and vitals and then diagnosed him with asthma. Before leaving, they prescribed an inhaler to alleviate his cough and improve his breathing. Unfortunately, this didn't help and over the next few days we watched his situation deteriorate further.

The fact that my wife's dad was only getting worse and doctors seemed unable to help prompted my wife and I to do our own research. Also, there were other issues that he was having at this point such as his legs and feet swelling with water and heavy wheezing. So after typing up his symptoms into Google, the best possible match we came up with was congestive heart failure. Molly and I felt confident enough with our diagnosis that we went ahead and scheduled an appointment with a cardiologist. Sure enough, the cardiologist confirmed our suspicions with the help of an EKG and chest ultrasound. They then prescribed a diuretic and blood thinner to stabilize his condition. After only a few days of taking his prescribed meds, Alex's health improved dramatically.

To make a long story short, Molly's parents moved to Iowa in June of 2021 and her dad's cough and breathing difficulty returned. We found out later that he was not staying regular with his heart meds and suffered a really bad relapse, which resulted in an emergency visit to the ER. Of course, the medical staff forced him to test for COVID, and the outcome was a positive test result [note: the standard PCR was used for this test]. Unfortunately, because of his low oxygen levels, the doctor in charge of his care started treating him for "aggressive COVID".

Molly's family was soon informed that Alex might have to be placed on a mechanical ventilator in order to assist with his breathing. When I learned this from my wife, I immediately swung into action. I was well aware of the consequences of mechanical ventilation and the higher than normal fatality rate in ventilated patients (see above). So I placed a phone call to the attending physician after receiving medical proxy permissions from my father-in-law and began to advocate for him.

I asked the attending physician why it was that Alex, who was diagnosed with congestive heart failure only several months prior, was being treated for COVID. The physician's response was sort of like, "well, because he has COVID these are the protocols we must follow". Obviously, I was hardly reassured by his reply. I then asked him to disclose all of the meds Alex was being placed on and found out that his primary course of treatment included Remdesivir. This explained why his situation seemed to deteriorate so quickly after only a few days of hospital care. I then insisted that my father-in-law be taken off of all COVID treatment and only be given heart meds such as diuretics and blood thinners. When the physician realized that I was not to be trifled with, he obeyed my orders and within a few days my wife's dad was back home with his health greatly improved.

Meanwhile, during our fight to save Alex from the dreaded fate of mechanical ventilation, my sister-in-law Tina contracted a very severe lung infection along with a high fever. And with her dad still in the hospital, she too ended up in the ER for emergency treatment. Since she was nearly nine months pregnant, and with COVID, the doctors decided to perform an emergency C-section in order to spare the baby from any harm while the mom was undergoing treatment. It is sad that Tina was never permitted to make any physical contact with her baby boy Alex, named after her dad. After 5 days on Remdisiver, her kidneys shut down and could no longer eliminate the water from her body (a side effect of this drug). With her kidneys no longer working, Tina's abdominal cavity quickly filled with water and she was no longer able to breathe properly through her lungs. She was then placed on mechanical ventilation and tragically died only 14 days later.

Tina was a trained medical attendant. She trusted her medical training and textbook knowledge of medicine. When her husband became aware that she was being advised to go on a ventilator, he contacted me in a desperate state hoping that I might be able to intervene. Unfortunately, I wasn't. Because of her trust in doctors, Tina refused our urgent pleas to hold off on the ventilator.

But even before this, long before Tina's physical condition deteriorated to the point of needing supplemental oxygen, we had tried to persuade her to take Ivermectin, a proven remedy for the lung inflammation associated with COVID (see here), but she declined because it was a non-approved drug.

Sadly, at that time, there was nothing further to be done for Tina and we surrendered her with much prayer into the Lord's care. We now understand that it was simply God's will to take her out of this world at the time of His choosing--for whatever the reason. And we are resolved to accept it, as tragic and painful it may be.

So what's the moral of this story? I hope it was adequately demonstrated that doctors DON'T always know best. And sometimes they get it wrong. VERY WRONG! Like the rest of us, they are not immune to error and corruption. This makes it risky and even foolish to place our full trust in any "medical professional" just because they have a fancy degree behind their name. We learned this the hard way... AND WE REALLY HOPE YOU WON'T HAVE TO.

Note: While Molly's dad was still in the hospital, we managed to secure some Ivermectin from a doctor friend of ours, who was kind enough to send us a prescription, even to the detriment of his medical license. Thankfully, my father-in-law's situation improved quickly after the doctors discontinued his COVID treatment and he no longer needed Ivermectin. However, several weeks later, Molly's oldest brother fell severely ill with what we suspect was influenza type A and had trouble breathing. Fortunately, he was wise enough to avoid medical treatment and instead allowed us to send him the Ivermectin tablets via express mail. We are happy to share that after only four days of Ivermectin, his condition improved dramatically.

The takeaway

Right now there are nefarious actors in powerful positions steering the response to this fabricated crisis. That's a fact we simply can't deny. They are intentionally suppressing any dialogue around this issue and controlling the public narrative. To examine their motive is not within the scope of this writing. But we can be sure there is ill intent at every level of their agenda. Therefore it is imperative to properly understand the full dynamics of the crisis we are facing and the lies we are being sold by mainstream media. It is time to do our own research. It is time to dig deeper and look beyond the facade if we wish to uncover the truth.

I hope that by sharing with you all of the information above you will be better equipped to determine the safest course of treatment for yourself and others. All I'm asking is that you become aware of the true cause of illness before surrendering yourself or your loved ones to medical professionals who may be ill-advised on how to diagnose and safely treat the condition.

Remember, don't place your trust in men, who can't save you anyway. First and foremost, trust God to deliver you in your hour of need so that you can proceed with confidence under His wise and loving guidance.

"Thus saith the Lord; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the Lord" (Jer. 17:5).

881 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All